<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0">
<channel><title><![CDATA[Compliance Focus - Comments for blog: Browsus interruptus, or how the present state of security is failing us]]></title><link>http://www.compliancefocus.com</link><description /><language>en-us</language><copyright><![CDATA[http://www.compliancefocus.com]]></copyright><generator>N/A</generator><webMaster>jim@compliancefocus.com</webMaster><lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:51:08 EDT</lastBuildDate><ttl>20</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Comment #1]]></title><link>http://www.compliancefocus.com/blogs/30/Browsus-interruptus-or-how-the-present-state-of-security-is-failing-us.html#Comment6</link><description><![CDATA[Jim  - 

Unfortunately, the problem you describe prevents non-technical users (the ones who need noscript the most) from using it.

A similar rant: http://lastinfirstout.blogspot.com/2008/05/flash-javascript-and-clowns-that-design.html

"There simply is no way that I can advise a non-technical user to browse in a somewhat safe manner under with the current state of browser technology and web site design......I've got a solution though - Make all web site designers & testers use a 1Ghz Pentium with 256MB of RAM for their workstation. I'll bet that they'll design fast, lightweight web sites."

I doubt that'll ever happen though. 

--Mike<br/><br/>
(Comment posted by Michael Janke at 8:44 pm, Thu 18th Dec 2008)]]></description><author>no@spam.com (Michael Janke)</author><pubDate><![CDATA[Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:44:31 EST]]></pubDate><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.compliancefocus.com/blogs/30/Browsus-interruptus-or-how-the-present-state-of-security-is-failing-us.html#Comment6</guid></item></channel></rss>